Posts filed under 'Knowledge Creation'

On The Park Bench

On an early morning jogging visit to the nearby park, you notice a pair of unkempt men. Unshaven and shabbily dressed, their greasy hair shows signs of fatigue as it sprouts from the sides of hats that have seen better days. One reaches out a half empty can of extra strength lager and gives a smile and a salute to his friend before chugging it back.

First impressions? A pair of drunks, probably homeless. They might even well deserve to be in the state they’re in.

That’s what you see. How about what you don’t see? How about the ‘perhaps?’ Perhaps the two men might have, one time, been a pair of very successful business partners; before some seriously unfortunate event caused their demise which ultimately left them out on the street. Why is the man holding out his beer can to the other and smiling? To celebrate drunkenness? Or perhaps he was he reminiscing a time when they were once very successful and his friend pulled off a big deal.

There’s always more to a story. However, our primary impression is based on our assumptions, experience and knowledge. Sticking to our prior assumptions, experience and knowledge will seriously limit ourselves to seeing only with our eyes and not what is beyond.

I think it is our job as curious human beings to try and find out the whole story before snapping to conclusions. Our duty as innovative human beings is to challenge our own assumptions, experience and knowledge in order to create new knowledge and experience new things.

In our unforgiving societies we are often looking at the ‘obvious’ and condemning people straight away. On the flip side, we are also very quick to put people on a pedestal and fall over their every word out of admiration.

Or sometimes we just need to see what we see with our eyes at face value, and look deeper so that we can see with our minds as well as our eyes. If we challenge ourselves continually there will be no end to the amount of new knowledge we can generate.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Possibly Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Add comment September 16th, 2009

Are Our Machines Stifling Our Creativity?

In the past we often used pen and paper to get our work done.

Nowadays we believe that sitting in front of a computer for long enough will surely enough produce some decent work given enough time.

My own experiments with this show that either 1) I am not using the tool correctly, or 2) it is a fallacy. In fact, sometimes I just feel myself staring at my computer screen whilst time disintegrates.

I have been pondering over this and find that we might be missing some creative catalysts such as twiddling our pens, staring at artifacts in the given room/area that we are seated, scribbling wildly, enjoying the fun of tearing something up, having the ability to change our location easily or even work outside without an electrical outlet. I’m sure there are many others too.

Furthermore, it is quite difficult to concentrate on our thinking at hand without an email or an instant message popping up on our screen to disrupt us.

The questions are: should we go back to pen and paper? Although the computer has increased our productivity, has it increased or decreased our creativeness? The kind of vocations that the ‘creative class’ are engaged in these days are not simply entering pre-defined work orders (ala Taylorism) but require much more thinking, creativity, harmonization of experience and learned knowledge, etc. Are computers/machines perhaps a legacy of Taylorism that do more to prevent unadulterated creativity than to fertilize it?

An interesting point on this comes in the form of Craig Grannell’s five tools to help designers make better websites. Those are: Basecamp, Firefox Web developer toolbar, Subversion, Silverback and most importantly ‘pen and paper

It appears to be a very long time before the computer will replace us, or at least, our thinking ability.

Let us go forth, draw, scribble, dream, write and let us see if we can free our minds to produce much better work away from our computer than chained to it.


Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Possibly Related Posts:

Add comment March 1st, 2009

Patented in China. A Nice Report by Thomson-Reuters

It seems like the nice folks at Thomson Reuters have provided us with a gem of a report written by Dr Eve Y. Zhou and Bob Stembridge.



A gem it is indeed. It seems like the Chinese government are really pushing for an innovation economy by 2020. The incentives are there for companies to file their innovations as they are 1) paid for by the government and 2) further monetary incentives are being given to those who can successfully get patents registered in foreign countries too.



Such incentives seem to be working too, at least so far in the areas of: Digital computers, Telephone and data transmission systems, Natural products and polymers, Computer peripheral equipment and the Fermentation industry. With quite a large amount of filings being made in the last ten years.



I’m not too sure about the law being passed that will force foreign companies to file their innovations in China first or risk losing legal protection. Could this be a potential barrier that foreign companies, who wish to invest in the country, might have to face? On the other hand, at the rate China is going, will the country even need foreign companies in 2020?



Only the future will tell.



You can download the full report here:
Patented in China the Present and Future State of Innovation in China

Chinese Flag

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Possibly Related Posts:

Add comment December 18th, 2008


Tags Cloud

Recent Posts

Blogroll

    Translate to: